I cant see the snake to good in the pic(not saying your wrong) but Ive never seen a copperhead that long not to mention they are usually really fat! Someone said they resemble a rat snake? I dont know how they look similiar.The pic does look like it could be a rat snake but in no way resembles a copperhead
I agree that it is not a Copperhead, mainly due to its girth. Copperheads are usually pretty fat once they hit maturity. I ran into one a couple of years ago that was only about 3ft long but was as big around as softball. Did you happen to get a look at its eyes? If it did not have cat eyes it def is not a Copperhead.
36 inches seems to be the largest a Copperhead gets:
http://www.snakesandfrogs.com/scra/snakes/copperh.htm
Old boy has a corn snake he killed.
That link cracks me up. I've killed them well over 36 inches in my own back yard....... But i have to agree the snake in the picture is not a copperhead. The body is far too skinny, and the head is not wide enough (yes even when zoomed in using photoshop). I'm going to have to say its definitely a rat snake.
Well i wouldnt doubt the validity of Andy or his father, who im sure has seen a snake or two in his day, also, it seems to me that the head does indeed have a diamond shape..... And for those inquiring minds out there... the world record is 53 inches and it was a southern copperhead, mainly indigenous to Oklahoma... Id measure that one and send that info in!!!
Triangular head doesn't make it a venomous snake. Not having a triangular head would mean it isn't venomous or it is a coral snake.
To tell and this works best on dead snakes. Is the eye. If the eye is round (pupil) then it isn't a rattlesnake, cottonmouth or a copper head. If the eye is a slit then it is!
Also the underside from the poop shoot on back is different. Single row is venomous and double row is not.
Thats a huge copperhead. I didnt think they got that long. One less snake to worry about..