Louisiana Sportsman Magazine
Magazine
Current Cover
  • Subscribe
  • In this Issue
  • Newsletter
  • Login











L.D.W.F.
C.C.A. Louisiana
BASS Federation
Hunters Education
Ethanol Free Info

Information
- Publications
- Staff
- Links
- Advertising

 
By Chris Ginn

Bookmark and Share
July 14, 2010
Pring this storyPrint
Email to a friendEmail to Friend
Only the areas in red are closed to recreational fishing after the Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission said tests proved there was no danger to the public.
Most Louisiana recreational fishing reopens for first time since BP oil spill
LDWF graphic
Only the areas in red are closed to recreational fishing after the Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission said tests proved there was no danger to the public.
Additional Images

For the past three months, Louisiana’s recreational anglers have had to surf Internet sites and study maps with their GPS units in hand to determine if they could legally fish their favorite areas.

Those days, for the most part, have come to an end.

Citing new information from the federal government, the Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission held a special meeting on Wednesday (July 14) to consider opening areas closed to all fishing due to the BP oil spill to recreational fishing, including charter boat captains and bait dealers.

After hearing public comments from a variety of Louisiana citizens including recreational anglers, charter captains, seafood wholesalers and distributors, CCA-LA and the Louisiana Wildlife Federation, the commission voted unanimously in favor of the proposal.

Click here to view the map of the remaining Grand Isle and Venice closures. To see the remaining closures in the Houma marshes, click here. A map of the remaining closures in the Breton and Chandleur sounds can be seen here. An interactive map can be accessed here.

Before the vote, Sec. Robert Barham told the commission that the Environmental Protection Agency had not found any evidence of dispersant in Louisiana’s inside coastal waters.

“That gave us a change of confidence,” Barham noted. “If we don’t have hydrocarbons -- we’ve run hundreds of samples on crab, shrimp and finfish, and there is no dispersant present -- our position has always been to get people fishing as rapidly as we could, and we are in that situation now.”

Voicing their support for the decision were CCA-LA and the Louisiana Wildlife Federation. Although not officially supporting the proposal, the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality’s Chris Piehler said he saw no risk associated with eating oysters, crabs, shrimp or finfish.

“We’re not taking a position on this,” he began. “We’re here to provide information to help the commission make an informed decision. Our observation from the data is that there is no reason for any worry over health advisories or human health risks.”

However, all in attendance did not support the proposal. Robert Walker, owner of Louisiana Seafood Exchange Inc., stated that he did not understand the rush to put recreational fisherman out there in closed areas.

“We are hours away from knowing if they can close (the leak),” he said. “And if that happens, we’re only days or weeks away from some areas clearing up. Everybody needs to check their sentiments of commercial versus recreational fisherman at the door. If we’re going to divide the forces, we’re going to have a major problem in the national media.”

Ewell Smith, executive director of the Louisiana Seafood Board, also spoke out against the proposal. His concern was that Louisiana would be mixing its message about whether our seafood was safe to eat.

“In Louisiana, we’re tuned in,” he said, “but across the nation, we’ve got to educate consumers where seafood comes from. If they see fishing boats in closed areas, it’s kind of like teaching a child who doesn’t know (anything about cows) where milk comes from. If we pass this, we will accelerate the collapse of our markets.”

Capt. Dudley Vandenborre again spoke out in favor of allowing recreational anglers to fish, but he had some reservations about being allowed to guide on waters where other commercial interests couldn’t make money off the resource.

“Speaking as a guide, how can I tell a crabber that he can’t go fish but I can?” Vandenborre said. “I use the resources just as much as the commercial crabbers and shrimpers, but for recreational fishing, I don’t see a problem with it.”

In the end, Vandenborre’s position didn’t matter because the resolution included charter fishing. As for other commercial anglers, Assistant Secretary Randy Pausina said their wait to get back to fishing shouldn’t be too much longer.

“With these maps, the green is not only what we are proposing to open for recreational fishing,” he said. “It’s also what the FDA is considering opening for the commercial side as well.”

   

Click here for more Oil Spill


6 - 4 of 6 Comment(s)  

6 reopenings

when are they going to open the area of fishing around dularge like the pickets and mardi gras that is our fishing area and there was never any oil there

5 fishing

Don't eat the fish!!! I remember many years ago, oil was released from an oil holding tank on Long Island, New York because of a fire...the oil settled on the clam beds, and the fish in the area were tested for contamination......results came back positive for contamination and would have harmed anyone eating the meat of the fish........why hasn't anyone done testing before people get sick....Obama's health plan is not in place yet, BP wouldn't be able to handle the illness and people will have the added trouble of ill health.....Please 'don't eat the fish'!!

4 BP Is Not Going to Leave

That was a crazy comment that BP is going to leave. BP would never leave the Gulf. They can make money there! It would not matter if every commercial station of BP's in the world closed down. They have an off market agreement with the US military to provide fuel and that agreement will stand. No matter how oily the Gulf gets. Check out Royal Dutch Shell on the Niger River Delta. This is the shape of the future. As I understand it anyway, every ten months an area the size of Manhattan disappears from the Mississippi Delta. Because the river has been diverted so much that it is not depositing the silt needed to build and maintain the delta. So you better go out fishing now and shooting birds now, because in 10 years there is not going to be any of them. Also stock up on Tuna, it also looks like they have gone the way of the cod. Belly up, extinct. Live by oil, die by oil. Lets see what the Gulf looks like in a year or two. Or a decade. Lots of time for lots more oil spills. BP is getting rid of wild Mustangs in Nevada. They get in the way. So does marine life. By-by marine life. All that creeps, crawls, swims or flys over the gulf. How many dead birds so far? Millions, rumor has it that BP burns the bodies at night. I don't know. I think that you guys who just think that it will be cleaning up the oil and business as usual have alot in common with Cleopatra, Queen of DeNile. You won't wake up because it is too scary.

Post a Comment

 

All fields are required.

Please keep your comments relevant to this story. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

An email will be sent to the specified email address given. You will be required to click on a link in the email to verify your comment.


View other articles written By Chris Ginn
or Email this story to a friend
Bookmark and Share






Top Fishing Photos

This is what its been like for the last month. Run Baby Run

Post your Fishing Report


Top Fishing Classifieds
Costa Del Mar-(Swordfish)
Scotsman MFE400 Ice Machine
50' trawl
Boards for shrimp trawl
New and Used Pflueger Reels

Post your Fishing Classified ad

Story Search
Featured Stories
and
Past News Stories
Advanced Search
Past Contents