bloodandguts
Mulie buck in full rut: large neck, smelly hocks
bloodandguts
Call this buck a dough.
Pat, you will usually find this in a place that is overcrowded with deer, and/or poor nutrition for antler development. One place that comes to mind quickly is Cat Island above St. Francisville in the 1970's. I remember opening morning of the 76-77 season, on the big bean field. I saw 76 deer at daylight,with only ONE that had visible horns about the size of a white bean. He was cropped. We hunted all season & killed 4 bucks with visible antlers. Was nothing to see 100 deer in a weekend, all females and bucks with no horns.Too many deer, not enough nutrition for antler development. The soybeans made em fat, but the antlers just didnt make the grade.
all i could find out is that you do see these in areas with a lot of does. apparently if it requires it to be homozygous of both recessive genes. My belief is that with too many does all the bucks get a shot at the gene pool, therefore increasing the chances of this happening. so, that's why we should strive to keep our buck to doe ratio 1:2 or 1:1. This would allow only dominant bucks to breed. but, that's a whole other can of worms. allowing this buck to walk and breed only increases the chances of this happening again.
I have been searching for the last 30 min. for a set of articles I read about two years ago on this very issue. What I can remember of the articles took place on the King ranch in South Texas in the 70's. A study on the ranch found these "mulie" bucks as we call them are actually gentically inferior bucks. on several ocassions these deer were killed in there prime from 4 1/2 to 6 1/2 years old. Some had large base nubs no longer than 6 inches and some had no horns at all. Of the deer with the nubs they tended to be very brittle and a lot of them were broken. They began a choice to remove all of these at any time they are seen by a hunter w/ no penalty to that hunter. To this day that rule is still in effect. As of the time I read the article 2 years ago they had not had a mulie killed on the ranch in at least 7 years and no one had seen one in that time as well. Tissue samples they had taken from the "mulies" showed the inability for those animals to produce a certain protein with similarities to calcium that helped grow and harden the horns. I forget the name of this protein. When normal bucks tissue samples came back these protein levels were normal to above normal. So I guess in the end it is a great idea to harvest these animals from your herd to keep from spreading this deficient mutation
We hunt a little area West of Basile La. and actually killed one this year. The deer was rust colored and we assumed it was a big doe. This deer was seen the previous three seasons by a few of us. This year one of the guys was watching this buck and several other does in a field when he noticed the stubs on the head and made the kill. It looked like a perfectly healthy and quite large doe from afar but this is the first time anyone was able to get a good look at the deer. Now we know that we will have to pay a little more attention inorder to cull these from the herd.
I hunt a place near you, a little north of harrisonburg. We sure aint seen anything like that, not even in any pics. We're really not seeing a whole lot. I dont have a clue about the history behind the mulies, but would sure like to know myself. Cant tell in the pics, but what happened to his rack?